• Havoc
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CS Wishlist
06-26-2016, 08:16 PM,
#21
RE: CS Wishlist
That's why we love ya Ed...stick to your guns and give 'em Hell my friend... Cheers3

Your point about higher level commanders requiring greater staff is valid and it's a viewpoint I hadn't considered.

It's all abstract in the end, and I would agree that a Divisional Commander would have more staff than a 2nd Lt. running a platoon.  Still, that 2nd Louie (Loo-eey?....sorry...Navy boy here...don't know the Army slang...we just called them snot nosed Ensigns) may be a 5 rated commander while the Brigadier General running the division is rated a 2.

I would think this suggests the game engine rating is how effective, or how "good" that commander is and irrespective of any staff attached.  Is it possible they are taking that into account with the HQ units?  I.E., a Battalion HQ moves quicker and pays less for movement then a Divisional HQ?

All I know is in The Longest Day  they managed to jam John Wayne (portraying Maxwell Taylor as I recall) into a single  wheelbarrow... Jester ... Flag
Quote this message in a reply
06-26-2016, 10:09 PM,
#22
RE: CS Wishlist
But, how many runners did he have? Radio men? Wheel barrel operators? Idea2

As far as the game mechanics, I agree. Regardless, the rating of how good a commander is should not be contingent on how many transports it needs to move him. Horray2

Farmer


HSL
Quote this message in a reply
08-09-2016, 01:54 AM,
#23
RE: CS Wishlist
I like to use the next unit/previous unit to progress through my turn. Playing larger scenarios I often have to save the turn and pick it up again later. Is there any way the program can save my place, so I don't have to start all over again with the first unit? 

Dave
Resolve then, that on this very ground, with small flags waving and tinny blast on tiny trumpets, we shall meet the enemy, and not only may he be ours, he may be us. --Walt Kelly
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2017, 05:50 AM,
#24
RE: CS Wishlist
My two cents. Wanted to get some play time in after a long hiatus before submitting:

Rubble -

Has my vote. If possible, would be good if there was a small chance for woods to catch on fire but burning wooden villages would be a good addition, even if it was only cosmetic in nature.

On Board Aircraft -
I wouldn't say get rid of our current aircraft system but if it means a dedicated icon/counter for aircraft that is moved around then definitely not.

Do think air support can be improved without significant changes. Assign a hex for a strike like we do now but assign so many fighter factors, assign combat air patrol factors if this is a large battle, ground attack factors or recon. This points can be assigned to different areas of a large map.

If a scenario designer doesn't like it or if it is a small skirmish then no need to use it.

The big change I recommend is get rid of spotting requirements from ground units for a successful attack. Think the pilots can spot their targets better than a Russian AT platoon. Of course, there was a lot of times units would have colored smoke to call in a strike but I'd say keep it abstract for ease of play. Assign target hexes for so many bombing factors along with CAP points for different areas of the map.

What I would really like to see is recon that would show ground units (if they survive enemy CAP) and the ability to assign air to ground strikes anywhere on the map. I'm guilty as the next guy but there's a reason there are a ton of AAMG platoons and AA guns and most of them don't belong on the front line. They need to remain by and protect their higher HQs and artillery positions.

Tank Riders, Loaded transport
Read the discussion on if everyone jumped off immediately after the first shots, historically they may not have but the precarious nature of loaded units means that if real life was like Campaign Series your electronic troopers would jump off at the first shot, each and every time. Let they guys unload automatically.

Armor facing and retreat.
Depends what level of abstraction you prefer. I don't mind it.

Unit Highlight
I hope the programmer can split the highlight unit feature (fixed, moved, organization, etc). It would be good if I could highlight all units in an organization but at the same time also select to highlight which units have moved or are fixed, etc.
Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2017, 10:51 PM,
#25
RE: CS Wishlist
Nice thoughts Cole, thanks for sharing! Helmet Smile
[Image: 29F3B1129F294B8EA9F0BA9508F86A6C.jpg]
Visit us at CSLegion.com
Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2017, 11:27 PM,
#26
RE: CS Wishlist
(12-03-2017, 10:51 PM)Battle Kat Wrote: Nice thoughts Cole, thanks for sharing! Helmet Smile

And a couple more thoughts!  Going forward, I remember interviews I did with Glenn Saunders and David Freer.  I think it was David that said he used to post on forums concerning CS, especially about armor factors.  Eventually, one of the designers asked him for references (I can't find the quote but basically "put up or shut up").  Going forward, any "good idea" I have about EF III, I'll try to add a reference(s).

This morning I was thinking about on board air recon ability.  If they, for example, spot a regiment of 152mm Russian artillery, it is slow going for that regiment to pack up and move if they use their assigned carriers.  The tracked carriers are very slow, especially compared with each side's stock truck units.  

Thing is, I was reading about Romanian Army transport (Mark Axworthy, Third Axis, Fourth Ally) and he mentions the lack of Romanian cross country ability on the Russian Steepe because they didn't have enough treaded transport and not enough 4WD trucks.  On roads, trucks of all types will go fastest but cross country those treaded artillery carriers were actually fast compared to anything else available.
Quote this message in a reply
12-05-2017, 04:36 AM,
#27
RE: CS Wishlist
(12-03-2017, 11:27 PM)Cole Wrote:
(12-03-2017, 10:51 PM)Battle Kat Wrote: Nice thoughts Cole, thanks for sharing! Helmet Smile

And a couple more thoughts!  Going forward, I remember interviews I did with Glenn Saunders and David Freer.  I think it was David that said he used to post on forums concerning CS, especially about armor factors.  Eventually, one of the designers asked him for references (I can't find the quote but basically "put up or shut up").  Going forward, any "good idea" I have about EF III, I'll try to add a reference(s).

This morning I was thinking about on board air recon ability.  If they, for example, spot a regiment of 152mm Russian artillery, it is slow going for that regiment to pack up and move if they use their assigned carriers.  The tracked carriers are very slow, especially compared with each side's stock truck units.  

Thing is, I was reading about Romanian Army transport (Mark Axworthy, Third Axis, Fourth Ally) and he mentions the lack of Romanian cross country ability on the Russian Steepe because they didn't have enough treaded transport and not enough 4WD trucks.  On roads, trucks of all types will go fastest but cross country those treaded artillery carriers were actually fast compared to anything else available.

This reminds me, this is a bit Off Topic, but are you guys aware Avalon Hill ended up significantly revising PB and PL vehicular movement speeds , and especially for cross country movement. Now, PB was a Jim Dunnigan design, so to alter anything was as close to blasphemy as anything. But alter they did. 

As of Arab-Israeli Wars, the vehicular movement factors were reduced to 60% level from original, with a suggestion to do the same for the said two earlier games. 

I checked this a while ago out of curiosity as how Campaign Series was done, for it was the same guys still at Talonsoft right. Turned out the movement factors were very close to AIW, so they had taken this into account. Yet, if cross country movement was very close to AIW, road movement still is a bit in the wild side. 

Ha.
[Image: 29F3B1129F294B8EA9F0BA9508F86A6C.jpg]
Visit us at CSLegion.com
Quote this message in a reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)