
I made this a sticky thread to keep it up high.

I made this a sticky thread to keep it up high.

But I see the difference in the assaults..takes more to move the enemy!
What I have a problem with is it changes the balance of a lot of the
scn.

Defender definetly has the advantage now!..need to make the optional rule avaliable!
Relayer
scn.

Defender definetly has the advantage now!..need to make the optional rule avaliable!
Relayer
I am of the same opinion. Not a big fan of the change.
Gavin

[/quote]
I am aware of how this change affects the game and I think that the new assault rules can make the game better. The old assault rules were garbage and IMHO unrealistic but with some tweaking of the new rules I see a great improvement. I have seen some people complain that the new rules will unbalance scenarios but since almost all of the scenarios are not balanced I don't see a problem. Also I am not a member of the Beta Brigade or an employee of Matrix

I made this a sticky thread to keep it up high.

Yes, Beta testers and Matrix game developers who have not recorded any ladder results in the past six months to a year, and/or who are not active members of the CS ladder but are registered to the CS forum.
They have a vested interest in padding the polling but not in the ladder or reported games? 
C'mon, no reason to be confused. I can name all the names if you wish and then have them checked by a "supermoderator" to see who voted for what.
Take away my vote and the votes of all the others who may be partial and we may have a poll that means something.
At the moment it is interesting that the majority want something other than the old or the new way.
What will the Matrix developers do then? 
Time will tell?
